Since these early days and
the experimentation with tape, electronic music has come along in leaps and
bounds, from multi-track recording techniques devised in part by Les Paul to
synthesizer design as discussed earlier, to the modern Digital Audio
Workstation such as Pro Tools, which today is being utilised by the likes of
Jarre. Tomita comments on computers versus tape recording at the Red Bull Music
Academy lecture-
“Well, now we have these computers, so yes, but before
I used tape recorders. After repeated recordings, I’d have to deal with tape
hiss. But the way I did so was I’d change the filters to some extent for the
strings. And... how do I say it? I’d change the pitch, too. I added thickness
to the sound by overdubbing it like that. With computers there’s no noise, so
the thickness can’t be brought out at all. But those tapes that I used to
record with, that tape hiss... I’d record a few times with the noise reduction
off and get that hiss. When you play the violin, it generates a kind of hissing
noise as well. It actually adds quite a bit of impact to the sound. I
discovered that. So for the sound of strings, I’d use noise reduction only for
the silent parts and leave it off for the rest. I crafted the sound by letting
the tape hiss blend into the recording on purpose. “(Tomita)[1]
Electronic music performance
has grown strongly since the Poeme Electronique, with such performances as
Jarre’s Rendezvous Houston live concert of music, fireworks and laser light
shows and Tomita’s Soundcloud performances. As we watch the advance of these
technologies it is interesting to muse upon what will come next in the
electronic world. Will we see performances from the Moon as Tomita suggested he
would have been thrilled to do. It was at Jarre’s Houston concert that the
saxophonist Ron McNair was meant to perform his Sax part from the space
shuttle Challenger which tragically exploded on take-off killing all on board.
How far back do these visions of performance go and what kind of mechanical
devises have been dreamed up in the past, paving the way for our modern
instruments and recording devices. Since the birth of the wax cylinder and the
gramophone record to magnetic tape and digital recording devices. It seems
Schaffer, Varese, Tomita, Jarre, Vangelis and others were around at just the
right time to bring into life this remarkable period of music making. From
makeshift devices like tape delay and reverb, echo and looping, to modern
sampling with such technology as the Fairlight CMI sampling computer of the
late 1970’s to Logic, Cubase and so on, we have seen technology burst forward
in such a short space of time. A bit on the Fairlight CMI-
“The Fairlight CMI is a keyboard that most of
us have probably never even seen, let alone played, yet it was one of the most
prominent synths of the early‑ and mid‑'80s and set the agenda for the way
'ordinary' synths would later develop. Sampling, graphic sequencers,
multitimbrality, software‑based synthesis and the concept of the 'workstation'
can all be traced back to this instrument. Coming from Australia,
a country not known for producing synthesizers, this was the keyboard that
broke all the established rules, even down to its colour. Consisting of several
large (cream‑coloured) parts plus loads of cables, it became the '80s digital
equivalent of the large analogue modulars that were produced 10‑15 years
earlier.”[2]
Fairlight CMI, circa 1980.
The Fairlight Computer Music
Instrument was able to sample sounds using a microphone or one could draw a
soundwave onto the computer screen using a light pen and play the sound back.
This instrument came at a hefty price of over two thousand pounds back in the
early 1980’s.
“The Fairlight CMI was designed by Peter Vogel and Kim
Ryrie and used a dual microprocessor architecture engineered by Tony Furse.
Providing a full complement of sound-design features, it was equipped with its
own dedicated computer, dual eight-inch disk drives, a six-octave
touch-sensitive keyboard, and software for the creation and manipulation of
sounds. Its most innovative feature was an analogue- to-digital converter for
processing incoming audio signals from analogue sources. The Fairlight CMI was
the first commercially available digital sampling instrument. It featured a
sequencer, 400 preset sounds.” (Holmes, p265.)[3]
“Peter Gabriel was the first
owner of a Fairlight Series I in the UK, with Boz Burrell of Bad Company
purchasing the second, which Hans Zimmer hired for many recordings during the
early part of his career. It was Peter Gabriel who introduced Kate Bush to the
Fairlight. She first began to use the Fairlight on her album Never for Ever. By
the time of the albums The Dreaming and Hounds of Love it had become her
primary writing tool.”[4]
The Fairlight was not the
only contender in computer-based music composition. The Synclavier was
developed in the 1960’s and is known as one of the first in digital synthesis. “The
first commercially available portable digital synthesizer was created at
Dartmouth University, New Hampshire, and developed by the composer Jon Appleton
and the engineers Sydney Alonso and Cameron Jones. Called the Synclavier, the
instrument used FM synthesis, was performance-oriented, and included a means to
store tracks of sound that could be used interactively with real-time keyboard
performance. The Synclavier set the early standard for computer-based
synthesizers. New England Digital Corp. was established to manufacture and sell
the product. The average cost of a Synclavier ranged from $200,000 to $300,000.
In the United States, Joel Chadabe purchased the first commercially available
Synclavier but without its keyboard controller. Instead, he asked Robert Moog
to develop Theremin-like gestural controllers for the synthesizer.”(Holmes
p265.)[5]
Frank Zappa and the Synclavier, Mid 1980’s.
[1] Red Bull Music Academy Lecture, Isoa Tomita, accessed
on 26/10/2019
[2] Sound on Sound, Fairlight computer music instrument,
accessed on 26/10/2019
[3] Holmes, T. 2008. Electronic and Experimental Music
[4] Kate Bush Encyclopaedia .com accessed on 26/10/2019
[5] Holmes,
T. 2008. Electronic and Experimental Music
Culture
No comments:
Post a Comment